![]() The streamer itself however will accept Naim pull or third party push. I think they have done a superb job… and arguably is one of the main benefits between the legacy and current architectures.īTW regarding some of your posts above it’s worth noting Naim UPnP renderer in the streamer uses the pull approach… some other control points such as those that control BubbleUPnPServer are server push… which is why there is a difference and why the Naim app won’t work with Bubble… as the Naim app actually communicates with the streamer, for playback functions. In the new architecture Naim in conjunction with StreamUnlimited went to great lengths with their NP800 subsystem to decouple the stream transport variances with sonic performance. So in all this it is now the streamer that is key, not the stream aggregator or media server. This is not the case in any meaningful way with the new streamers especially with decoupled DACs. So for example Asset and BubbleUPnPServer sounded different (subtly… but always clearly identifiable) despite playing the same media on the same platform. ![]() I shared my findings and traces with Naimbased on my NDX whilst they were developing the new streamers. I found a correlation between sonic performance and inter media frame timing consistency during the media bursts, and TCP session management exchanges. I found the with the Naim legacy streamers, media was subtly different from different media servers. You don’t say what streamer you have unless I have missed it. It feels like the lifespan of my 272 just got further extended ! ![]() Next step might be to set up Roon but I’ll first explore about Roon. A clear uplift in SQ vs Tidal on a number of tracks. Now enjoying Qobuz on the 272 and very happy about it. I had to tweak some settings on my firewall and I suppose that’s what made it work ultimately. ![]() The main issue I faced was to get the NAC272 listed in the list of ‘media renderers’ when setting up BubbleUPnp. But step by step and in the end it worked. The part about typing code in the Terminal window of the Mac was a bit scary as just copy/pasting stuff that was totally foreign to me. I’ve also followed the instructions from. I already had the NAS up and running and for me it was all about setting up the BubbleUPnp server. I spent a couple of hours and thought it would never work but in the end it did ! Powered by a brand new 64-bit quad-core processor, DS418 delivers excellent data transfer speed and 10-bit 4K H.265 video transcoding on the fly.Managed to make it work on a Mac with a synology NAS and the Linn Kazoo app and NAC272 yesterday. Boost work productivity with enhanced collaboration tools and further protect your data with robust backup solutions. Synology DS418 offers massive storage capacity that makes it easy to create your own private cloud and maintain complete control over your data. With over 80TB of storage and a pair of Synology units for running Plex, this is bound to offer some insight into how you can configure either of the aforementioned NAS. Otherwise, be sure to check out our feature that details all of the gear in my current homelab. I’ve been using one of these exclusively for backups over the past few months and have been impressed with the performance. Synology Disk Station DS418 is a high-performance and versatile 4-bay NAS, specifically designed for offices and home users to effectively manage, protect. You’re notably stepping down to a single hard drive bay, but will make out for less than the lead deal. Synology DS918+ (came with a Single Synology 4GB SODIMM module), Intel Celeron J3455 CPU running at 1.5Ghz I am running DSM 7.1. For those just getting started with always-on storage, going with the highly-rated Synology DS220j at $170 might be a better option.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |